Speech & Hearing, Mysore, was earlier awarding M.Sc. degree in Speech & Hearing and now, it is awarding M.Sc.. degree in Speech Language Pathology & Audiology, etc. and the schedule shows that both qualifications are recognized, etc. So it is clear that Annexure A-1 M.Sc. degree was offered by the University of Mysore, following the designation for the old pattern of the process, followed even by the premium institute in the country. So, the designation by itself may not be very material and designation of the nomenclature of the course by itself may not be fully material in the facts of the case, so long as the person concerned has secured registration of the said qualification in the Central Rehabilitation Register, in terms of Sec.2(k), Sec.19 & Sec.23 of the RCI Act. Annexure A-3 entries would clearly show that the M.Sc. degree in Speech & Hearing, awarded to the respondent by the University of Mysore in 2013, has been added in the said statutory register given in the name of the applicant, as an additional qualification and he has also been clearly recognized in Annexure A-3 as a rehabilitation professional as Audiologist & Speech Pathologist. So also, taking note of the specific stand of the 3rd respondent-KUHS, even de hors Annexure A-5 certificate, the abovesaid Annexure A-1 M.Sc. degree qualification of the applicant in Speech & Hearing, is a qualification recognized by the RCI, as evident from the registration granted to the applicant, in terms of Annexure A-3. So, the inevitable conclusion is that the aspects stated and certified in Annexure A-5 & Annexure A-13, are only declaratory and
