Hridya v. Prajeesh
Case brief
What is this about?
HC disbdescribes that, having filed a memo and being heard, this O.P. was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 5TH KARTHIKA,
1944
OP(CRL.) NO. 136 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.01.2020 IN CMP 816/19 IN MC 35/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS :
1 HRIDYA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.PRAJEESH, PARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAKULAM DESOM, P.O.KOOLIMUTTAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2 MINOR THEERTH, S/O.HRIDYA, PARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAKULAM DESOM, P.O. KOOLIMUTTAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REP. BY GUARDIAN 1ST PETITIONER BY ADVS. SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT :
PRAJEESH AGED 39 YEARS S/O.DAYANANDAN, PARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POOMANGLAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680733 BY ADVS. SRI.VYSAKH VIJAYAN SMT.NIVEA LIZ PETER FERNANDEZ
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hridya
- petitioner
Minor TheertH
- respondent
Prajeesh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court