S. Gopakumar v. v. Vamadevan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge observed that the preliminary finding on maintainability of the suit entered by Munsiff Court should be confirmed and the question of maintainability is left open to be decided during final hearing based on evidence.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner is inclined to confirm the order under challenge; question of maintainability is left open to be decided during final hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 742 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 1219/2020 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT:
S. GOPAKUMAR
AGED 74 YEARS
SON OF SHANKARAN NAIR,
SAIKRIPA, VN NO.22, VYASA NAGAR,
PARUTHIPARA, PATTOM P O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
BY ADV G.S.REGHUNATH
RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONERS & PETITIONERS 2 TO 5/PLAINTIFFS &
DEFENDANTS 2,3,6 AND 7:
1V. VAMADEVAN NAIR
AGED 67 YEARS
SON OF VELAYUDHAN PILLAI,
KAMALAVILASOM PUTHEN VEEDU,
KOLLAMCODE VILLAGE,
VILAVAMCODE TALUK,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DEVI KRIPA,
HOUSE NO.27, T.C.15/1102, VYASA NAGAR,
PARUTHIPARA, PATTOM P O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,, PIN – 695 004
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the preliminary finding on maintainability of suit is final or should be left open?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. GOPAKUMAR
- respondent
V. VAMADEVAN NAIR
Coram
A. BADHARUDEEN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court