Jerald, v. Arhadas
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed an application challenging an order appointing an Advocate Commissioner in a suit for declaration of title. The Court, finding no illegality in the appointment, directed the court below to consider the original injunction application within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Referred the original injunction application to the lower court to be disposed of within two weeks of receipt of the new Commission Report.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 2119 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A NO.5/2021 IN O.S NO.449/2018 OF PRINCIPAL
MUNSIFF COURT, NEYYATTINKARA
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF IN THE SUIT :-
1 JERALD, S/O OUSAPE, DIYA HOUSE,
AMBALATHUMMOOLA, ADIMALITHURA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE,
CHOWARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 501.
2 N. LEELA, W/O. JERALD, DIYA HOUSE, AMBALATHUMMOOLA, ADIMALITHURA, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE, CHOWARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 501.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JERALD / N. LEELA vs. ARHADAS / JASEENTHA / YESUDASAN / SOPIYA
Coram
MARY JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court