Sekhar v. Pappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, in O.P(C) No.177/2016, considered a prayer to re-transfer O.S.No.43/2013 back to the Munnar Special Tribunal. The Court held the petition infructuous as the Tribunal was abolished and the case had already been returned to the Munsiff Court.
What did the court decide?
The application (O.P(C). No.177 of 2016) is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1944
OP(C) NO. 177 OF 2016
IN O.S.NO.43 OF 2013 PENDING ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT,
DEVIKULAM
PETITIONER:
SEKHAR, AGED 55 YEARS,
S/O.MUNISAMY, CENTRE DIVISION, SURIANELLY ESTATE,
HARRISON MALAYALAM LIMITED, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE,
UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANANTHAKRISHNAN
SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN
RESPONDENTS:
1PAPPA,
SURIANELLY KARA, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE,
UDUMBANCHOLA, IDDUKKI
2ANITHA,
SURIANELLY KARA, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE,
UDUMBANCHOLA, IDDUKKI
3KASIYAMMA,
SURIANELLY KARA, CHINNAKANAL VILLAGE,
UDUMBANCHOLA, IDDUKKI
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition seeking re-transfer of a case returned from the Munnar Special Tribunal to Munsiff Court is maintainable when the Tribunal has already been abolished.
Whether the petition praying for re-transfer of O.S.No.43/2013 has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sekhar
- respondent
Pappa
- respondent
Anitha
- respondent
Kasiyamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court