This court disposed of a matrimonial appeal by dismissing it as withdrawn. The appellant filed a memo stating she no longer proposed to proceed with the appeal. The court recorded this and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
The matrimonial appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 27TH ASWINA, 1944
MAT.APPEAL NO. 1427OF 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.11.2017 IN
O.P.NO.904 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT,
PALAKKAD
APPELLANT:
GEETHA
AGED 29 YEARS
D/O.CHANDRAN, AGED 29 YEARS, PADETTY HOUSE, ERI-
MAYUR P.O., ALUTHUR, PALAKKAD-678621.
BY ADVS.
SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K.
SRI.ABE RAJAN
SRI.LIJU. M.P
RESPONDENT:
UNNIKRISHNAN
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O.SIVARAMAN, AGED 39, BEENA HOUSE, KANNODE,
KANJIKKODE POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678621.
BY ADVS.
SMT.ANU JACOB
SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
SRI.K.A.SIYAD
SRI.K.V.WINSTON
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2
Mat.Appeal No.1427 of 2017
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The appellant is the respondent in O.P.No.904 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Palakkad, which was one filed by the respondent herein-husband, seeking a decree of divorce of the marriage solemnized between them on 07.02.2011. That original petition is one filed under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was tried along with connected matters. By the judgment dated 15.11.2017, the Family Court allowed O.P.No.904 of 2014 and granted a decree dissolving the marriage solemnised between the appellant and the respondent on 07.02.2011. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Family Court, the appellant filed this appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
Mat.Appeal No.1427 of 2017
3
“It is respectfully submitted that the appellant does not propose to proceed with the above appeal. Hence, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow for withdrawing the above appeal.”
In the above circumstances, recording the aforesaid memo
filed by the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE
yd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to admit the withdrawal of a matrimonial appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act.
Whether to allow the withdrawal memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Geetha
Unnikrishnan
Anil K. Narendran
P.G. Ajithkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court