awarded towards extra nourishment. Deducting the amount already awarded by the Tribunal, the balance would be Rs.2,500/- (5,0002,500). Claimant was 40 years old at the time of accident. Suitable multiplier to be adopted as per Sarla Verma(smt) v. Delhi Transport Corporation Anr. (2009 6 SCC 121) approved by the Constitution Bench in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors (2017 (4) KLT 662) is '15'. So, towards permanent disability, the claimant is entitled to get 6,000x12x15x24/100=2,59,200/- . Deducting the amount already awarded, the balance would be Rs.1,89,000/- (2,59,200-70,200). Towards pain and suffering, Rs.25,000/- was awarded by the Tribunal. In view of the period of treatment as well as injuries sustained by the claimant, an amount of Rs.30,000/- can be awarded towards pain and suffering. Deducting the amount already awarded, the balance would be Rs.5,000/- (30,000-25,000). Towards loss of amenities, only Rs.5,000/- was awarded by the Tribunal. Taking into account the fact that injuries sustained by the claimant involve fracture of both bone right leg, I am of the view that Rs.15,000/- can be awarded towards loss of amenities. Deducting the amount already awarded, the balance would be Rs.10,000/- (15,000-5,000). Hence, the claimant is entitled
