This is a Motor Accident Claims Appeal. The appellant had failed to issue notice to respondents despite an order dated 06.11.2014, and the court assumed a lack of prosecution interest for the year 2014 appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MACA NO. 1855 OF 2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 29TH POUSHA, 1943
MACA NO. 1855 OF 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 481/2009 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,KASARAGOD
APPELLANT/S:
KANNAN.M. AGED 70 YEARS S/O AMBU, PODIKKALANPARAMBIL, KOOBRAM, POST KAKKARA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 306.
BY ADV SRI.I.V.PRAMOD
RESPONDENT/S:
1 A.H.ABDULKHADER AGED 65 YEARS S/O B.M. ABDULLA HAJI, R/AT BENDICHAL, PO THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN - 671 541.
2 A.M. NABEESA AGED 55 YEARS W/O A.H.ABDULKHADER, R/AT BEDICHAL, P.O THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN - 671 541.
3 SAIFUDHEEN AGED 29 YEARS S/O A.H.ABDULKHADER, R/AT BENDICHAL, PO THEKKIL, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN - 671 541.
4 PRASHANTH KUMAR T AGED 34 YEARS S/O NARAYANAN, R/AT VARAPAKKAM HOUSE, VISHNUMANGALAM, PO HARIPURAM, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671 314
MACA NO. 1855 OF 2014
2
S/O KARUNAKARAN, HOUSE NO.2/458F, KANKOL, ALAPADAMBA PO, PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 337.
6 CHALUNGAL ANIL THOMAS AGED 37 YEARS S/O THOMAS, R/AT NARKILAKKAD, WEST ELERI VILLAGE, POST WEST ELERI, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671 314.
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
MACA NO. 1855 OF 2014
JUDGMENT
Despite the order dated 06.11.2014, the appellant has not taken steps to issue notice to the respondents. The appeal is of the year 2014. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/-
C.S.DIAS JUDGE
rkc
KANNAN.M
A.H.ABDULKHADER
A.M. NABEESA
SAIFUDHEEN
PRASHANTH KUMAR T
SREEJAYAN
C.S. Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
