Thomas v. Peter
Case brief
What is this about?
FAO (RO) No. 138 of 2014. Appeal from remand order settled out of court; parties filed memo to that effect.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
FAO (RO) NO. 138 OF 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.10.2011 IN OS 322/2010 OF
MUNSIFF COURT, CHALAKUDY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.03.2014 IN AS 215/2011 OF
PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT/COUNTER CLAIM PETITIONER:
THOMAS,AGED 69,
S/O.POOVATHUSSERY IRUMBAN MATHEW, POOVATHUSSERY DESOM,
KALLUR THEKUMURY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
THOMAS
- respondent
LALI PETER (LEGAL HEIRS OF 1 PETER)
Coram
P. SOMARAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court