This court dismissed a first appeal filed by decree holders as infructuous, noting that the council had already been finally heard on the same day.
The first appeal (FAO No. 57 of 2016) is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA,
1944
FAO NO. 57 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13/11/2015 IN EP 28/13 IN EA
360/2015 IN OS 320/2009 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT /
COMMERCIAL COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS/DECREE HOLDERS:
NADA, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.ROHITH
SRI.MANOJ GEORGE
RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
KARUMADY S.N.D.P. SAKHA YOGAM
AT KARUMADI,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA 688 564
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
FAO NO. 57 OF 2016
..2..
J U D G M E N T
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this FAO is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE
PR
K.Chandrasekharan
Thankamma Chandrasekharan
Karumady S.N.D.P. Sakha Yogam
A.Muhamed Mustaque
Shoba Anamma Eapen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
