P.K.C Fruits v. Shihabudheen
Case brief
What is this about?
This short order maintained existing interim orders attaching property and restraining alienation in a pending civil suit. It directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within two months.
What did the court decide?
Interim orders maintained; suit directed to be disposed of within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 25TH KARTHIKA,
1944
FAO NO. 9 OF 2017
IA 899/2015 & 560/2016 IN OS 40/2015 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
P.K.C FRUITS, M.M. ALI ROAD, PALAYAM, CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MAJEED K.P., S/O.MOIDEEN, FOUJI VILLA, POOVATTUPARAMBU (PO)., PERUVAYAL AMSOM POOVATTUPARAMBA DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether interim orders regarding attachment and restraint on alienation of property should be maintained.
Whether the pending civil suit should be disposed of within a fixed time.
Whether interim orders remain subject to final orders in the underlying suit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.K.C Fruits
- respondent
Shihabudheen
- respondent
Sakeer
- respondent
Parambil Ibrahim
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court