Janardhanan v. Davis
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Kerala allowed an appeal setting aside an ex parte decree and dismissing an order after parties reached a settlement in mediation, directing restoration of the suit and decreeing per mediation terms.
What did the court decide?
Ex parte decree and impugned order set aside; suit restored for settlement recording; appeal disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA,
1944
FAO NO. 141 OF 2018
ORDER DATED 29.09.2016 IN IA 3654/2015 IN OS 1044/2011 OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT/PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:
JANARDHANAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.VELU, KURIYAKOTTIL HOUSE, KUMBLANGATT DESOM, WADAKKANCHERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILY TALUK, KANJIRAKODE.P.O, THRISSUR.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the ex parte decree be set aside based on settlement reached in mediation.
Whether the suit be restored for recording of settlement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Janardhanan
- respondent
Davis
Coram
A.Muhamed Mustaque
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court