V.Salim v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR. Noting that a final report had been submitted, the Court closed the matter without prejudice to future challenges to the final report.
What did the court decide?
The criminal miscellaneous case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to challenge the final report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022/15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 759 OF 2015
PETITIONER/S:
1 V.SALIM AGED 53 YEARS S/O.VIJAYAN, RESIDING AT MINNARAM, NADAKKAL, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2 G.VINOD AGED 43 YEARS S/O.N.GOPINATHA KURUP, RESIDING AT VRINDAVAN, NADAKKAL, ADUTHALA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682030.
- 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARIPPALLY POLICE SATION, PARIPPALLY P.O., KOLLAM-691574. ADV SEENA C -PP
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant a writ of quashing in light of the submission of a final report.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Salim
- petitioner
G.Vinod
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
The Sub Inspector of Police Parippally
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court