Court granted permission to withdraw Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3926 of 2021, which challenged the order in Special Court under POCSO Act, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Criminal Miscellaneous Case granted; case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 3926 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 205/2021 OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT, KOTTAYAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
XAVIOUR SIBY AGED 24 YEARS S/O. SIBY, PALLIPARAMBU HOUSE, PULIKKUNNU, ERUMELI, VENNIYOOR DESOM, VENGOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS. SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY K.R.RIJA
RESPONDENTS/ STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
2 XXX XXX
SRI C N PRABHAKARAN -SR PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No. 3926 of 2021
..2..
O R D E R
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2022
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this Crl.M.C. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE
APA
Crl.M.C.No. 3926 of 2021
..3..
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3926/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
| Annexure A | TRUE COP NO.67/21 |
Y OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME OF MUNDAKKAYAM PS. |
|---|---|---|
| Annexure B | TRUE COP MANU/TN/0 |
Y OF THE DECISION REPORTED AS 254/2021. |
| Annexure C | TRUE COPY | OF THE ORDER ISSUING DIRECTIONS IN |
| CRIMINAL | APPEAL NUMBER 1087/2019 DATED | |
| 9.9.2020. |
XAVIOUR SIBY
STATE OF KERALA
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
