This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 31ST BHADRA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 3528 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTCC 405/2016 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS -I, KANNUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 3
1 ARAYAKANDI SALIMAGED 53 YEARS
S/O. ACHUTHAN, ARAYAKANDI HOUSE, ANDALUR, POST PALAYAD,
THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.
2 THOTHEN KANAKAM AGED 56 YEARS D/O. KRISHNAN, THOTHEN HOUSE, ANDALUR, POST PALAYAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.3THOTHEN AJITHAKUMARI
W/O. ARAYAKANDI SALIM, ARAYAKANDI HOUSE,ANDALUR, POST
PALAYAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.V.VENUGOPAL
SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERCRIME NO.107/2014 OF DHARMADAM POLICE STATION, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670 001.
3 K.K.RAMESHADVOCATE, 'AARAMAM', POST PALAYAD-670 661, THALASSERY,
KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.B.KRISHNAN
SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY
ADV VIPIN NARAYAN -PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 22.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl MC No. 3528 of 2016 2
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. , J.
=========================== Crl. MC No. 3528 of 2016
============================ Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2022
O R D E R
When the matter came up for admission, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners upon instructions submitted that he is not pressing the
Criminal Miscellaneous case.
Accordingly, the Crl. MC. is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE
sks/-
ARAYAKANDI SALIM
THOTHEN KANAKAM
THOTHEN AJITHAKUMARI
STATE OF KERALA
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court