undertaking the act of taking the sample from the contraband himself is irreconcilable. The water-tight compartments provided for the investigator and the Court in a criminal prosecution cannot, at any rate, be allowed to be traversed or interchanged. It is pertinent to note that the detecting officer, after investigation, is to file the fnal report before the Magistratei . If the Magistrate himself undertakes the act of taking the sample from the contraband produced before him, the question of independent consideration of fnal reporti laid by the investigating officer before the learned Magistrate, which is cardinal to criminal jurisprudence, would fail. This finding is fortified by the decision of this Court in Smithesh v. State of Kerala [2019 (2) KLT 974] , wherein this Court held that the Magistrate has no power or authority to collect samples from the contraband produced before him. In Baby v. State of Kerala [2020 (2) KLT 590] , this Court had an occasion to consider whether the Magistrate has the power or authority to direct the investigating officer to draw the sample from the contraband produced before the Court for sending to the chemical examiner. This Court held that the learned Magistrate had traversed the jurisdictional limits by issuing orders to take samples from the contraband produced before him for the purpose of sending it to the Chemical Examiner's laboratory.
