A contempt case filed against the respondent in W.P.(C) No. 27298 of 2021 was dismissed as the original writ petition was disposed of and the respondent's subsequent communication was deemed to satisfy the prior court directions, closing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 968 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 27298/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER
P.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
AGED 70 YEARS
S/O. OMANA AMMA, SREELEKSHMI,
KARIKKATTUVILA, PERINGODU, PALLICHAL P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN – 695020
BY ADV T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR
RESPONDENT:
VINAY MOHAN KWATRA
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
THE FOREIGN SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS,
NEW DELHI, PIN – 110002
BY ADV MANU S.- DSGI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 09.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO.968 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2022
W.P.(C) No.27298 of 2021 was disposed of by this Court
on 16.12.2021 directing the 2nd respondent in the writ petition to
pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 representation submitted by the petitioner.
the petitioner on 18.01.2022 seeking to provide certain documents for consideration of the representation.
and the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India representing the respondent.
CON.CASE(C) NO.968 OF 2022
3
dated 13.06.2022, I am of the view that the directions contained in the judgment are substantially complied with. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the communication dated 13.06.2022 and if the petitioner has any surviving grievance, the petitioner will be
at liberty to take up the matter appropriately.
The Contempt of Court Case is closed accordingly.
sd/-
N.NAGARESH
JUDGE
hmh
CON.CASE(C) NO.968 OF 2022
4
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 968/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure1CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC
NO.27298 OF 2021 DATED 16.12.2021
PASSED BY THIS COURT
Annexure2TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED
18.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
P. Radhakrishnan Nair
Vinay Mohan Kwatra
Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi
N. Nagares
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court