Contempt case dismissed as petitioners submitted that the judgment they sought to enforce had been complied with, and the matter was closed.
Contempt case closed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 75 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22287/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1 P.R.DANAVAN AGED 67 YEARS S/O.LATE RAJAPPAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANNUR, CHOWARA P.O.,ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 571. 2 ARUN SAGAR S/O.P.R.DANAVAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANNUR, CHOWARA P.O., ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 571. 3 ABITHA @ AMRITHA D/O.P.R.DANAVAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANNUR, CHOWARA P.O., ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 571. BY ADVS. G.HARIHARAN PRAVEEN.H.
RESPONDENTS:
ANIYAMMA VARGHESE.K. AGED 50 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE TAHSILDAR (SURVEY), CHITTUR TALUK, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 101.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 75 OF 2022
2
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY SR.G.P.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 75 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
When this matter was called today, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the judgment has been complied with by the respondents; and therefore, that the afore Contempt Case is not being pressed. Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed.
ANB
Sd/DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
CON.CASE(C) NO. 75 OF 2022
4
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 75/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
| Annexure I | TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION |
|---|---|
| CERTIFICATE DATED 12/01/1999 | |
| ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONERS RELATING TO THE PROPERTIES MENTIONED ABOVE. |
|
| Annexure II | TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 13/01/1999 ISSUED |
| BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONERS RELATING TO THE PROPERTIES MENTIONED ABOVE. |
|
| Annexure III | TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 20/10/2003 SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE TAHSILDAR. |
| Annexure IV | TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 19/07/2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, CHITTUR. |
| Annexure V | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT MADE IN WP(C) NO.22287/2021 DATED 03/11/2021. |
| Annexure VI | TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 09/11/2021 SENT BY THE RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
P.R.Danavan and Another (2
Aniyamma Varghese
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
