Disposed
Meera K v. Apm Muhammed Hanish
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/717/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF 2022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 717 OF 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 28TH VAISAKHA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 717 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.11.2021 IN WP(C)NO.22845/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN THE WRIT PETITION:
1 MEERA K AGED 49 YEARS W/O N.P SURESH, HSA(MALAYALAM), PTM HIGH SCHOOL, THRIKKATERI, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679502(NEELAMBARI HOUSE, PATHAIKKARA POST, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM-679322. 2 FASEELA M, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O ABDUL JAMAL A, HSA(NATURAL SCIENCE), PTM HIGH SCHOOL, THRIKKATERI, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 679502 [ALIKKAL HOUSE,KURUVATTOOR POST, VALLAPUZHA,PATTAMBI,PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679336] 3 SAJID K, AGED 38 YEARS S/O ABOOBACKER K, HSA(ENGLISH), PTM HIGH SCHOOL, THRIKKATERI, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 679502 [KOZHIKATTIL HOUSE, POONTHAVANAM POST, AKKAPARAMBU,PERINTHALAMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679325] BY ADVS. N.ABHILASH POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN THE WRIT PETITION:
A P M MUHAMMED HANISH, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 717 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
When this matter was taken up, Sri.Abhilash, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the directions in the judgment
have been complied with and he has no further grievance.
This Contempt Case is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
IAP
CON.CASE(C) NO. 717 OF 2022 3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 717/2022
PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES :
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.22845/2021 DATED 01.11.2021 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.1174/2022/G.EDN. DATED 28/02/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT(S) ANNEXURES :
Meera K
Faseela M
Sajid K
A P M Muhammed Hanish
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court