Rukhiya Ashraf, v. Ani P.N.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed a contempt of court petition where both parties submitted that the directions in the judgment had been complied with, leading the court to close the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed and dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 695 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 18814/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER:
RUKHIYA ASHRAF,
AGED 63 YEARS
W/O. ASHRAF, MADASSERY HOUSE,
PUTHUPALLIPRAM, KUNNATHUNAD, ERNAKULAM 682 024.
BY ADVS.
N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI
RENI JAMES
RESPONDENT:
ANI P.N.,
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RDO OFFICE,
MUVATTUPUZHA , ERNAKULAM 686 661.
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER-SR.GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 695 OF 2022
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rukhiya Ashraf
- respondent
Ani P.N.
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court