In a contempt proceeding, the petitioner alleged violation of privacy directions. The respondent Government Pleader submitted compliance was achieved with no cameras facing the petitioner's house. The court accepted this submission, closed the case, and preserved liberty to approach the court for future violations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 69 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15111/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SMT. MRINALINI AGED 70 YEARS W/O. LATE RAGHAVAN HARIDAS, KADAYIL VEEDU, VALIYA KADA, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101
BY ADVS. S.EASWARAN P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM) P.SREEKUMAR (THOTTAKKATTUKARA) K.V.RAJESWARI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.2:
SAJEESH,
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101
BY SMT.PARVATHY - GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 69 OF 2022
2
J U D G M E N T
When this matter was called today, the learned Government Pleader submitted that, all action has been taken by the respondents in implicit compliance with the directions of this Court and that the privacy of the petitioner has been completely protected, making sure that no camera is facing her house or personal space.
I record the afore submissions and close this Contempt Case; however, leaving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if any violation of the afore undertaking is found in future.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
rp
CON.CASE(C) NO. 69 OF 2022
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 69/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 24TH SEPTEMBER, 221 IN WPC NO.15111 OF 2021 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.10.2021 SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO THE HOME MINISTER Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 26.10.2021 Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 26.10.2021 Annexure A7 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT TO 2ND RESPONDENT Annexure A8 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT DATED 26.10.2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents have complied with the directions regarding the privacy of the petitioner.
SMT. MRINALINI
SAJEESH
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
