Dismissed

Dr.S.Y. Ganga v. Dr. Venu

Kerala HC1 Nov 2022Con.Case(C)/671/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court closed the contempt case filed for non-compliance of a previous order. The Government Pleader stated the representation was rejected via an order dated 10.10.2022. The Court permitted the petitioner to challenge the rejection order. Rules were discharged.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; rules discharged; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the rejection order dated 10.10.2022.

Dr.S.Y. Ganga Vs Dr. Venu — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 671 OF 2022

¶5

PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:

¶6

DR.S.Y. GANGA
AGED 60 YEARS
GANGOTRI, ADITYA NAGAR-315, VADAKKEVILA P.O.,
KOLLAM (RETIRED PRINCIPAL, M.P.M.M.S.N. COLLEGE,
SHORNUR – 691010

¶7

BY ADV M.S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR

¶8

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC:

¶9

1DR. VENU
AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (NOW DESIGNATED AS ADDITIONAL CHIEF
SECRETARY), HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001

¶10

2MS. V. VIGNESHWARI
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,
VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN – 695033

¶11

3MR. C.C. BABU
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION THRISSUR,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE COLLEGIATE
EDUCATION, PALACE ROAD, CHEMPUKKAVU,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680020

¶12

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶13

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

CON.CASE(C) NO. 671 OF 2022

¶15

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

In pursuance to the directions given by this Court in W.P. (C).No.20606 of 2021 dated 07.12.2021, since no action has been taken, petitioner has filed the Contempt Case.

¶18

Sri.Jimmy George, learned Government Pleader who was present in Court has informed that the order on the representation of the petitioner has been passed on 10.10.2022 rejecting the matter. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. Contempt case is closed. Rules stand discharged.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL JUDGE

nak

CON.CASE(C) NO. 671 OF 2022

¶23

¶24

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 671/2022

¶25

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶26

Annexure-1CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED
7.12.2021 IN W.P.(C) NO. 20606/2021 OF
THIS HONOURABLE COURT
Annexure-2TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 30.9.2021 IN
W.P.(C) NO.20644/2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE
COURT
Annexure-3TRUE COPY OF COVERING LETTER SENT BY THE
PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED
1.1.2022

Dr.S.Y. Ganga v. Dr. Venu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.S.Y. Ganga v. Dr. Venu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kader Mohammed Iqbal Vs V.R. Premkumar

Sajeev Kumar Vs Cholams Insurance Company Limited

Moosa Haji@Moothedath Moosa Vs United India Insurance Company

K.K.Rajesh, Vs C.D.Suresh

Dr.Sunny Joseph Vs the Recovery Officer

Dr. Sunny Joseph Vs the Deputy Director