Contempt of Court case closed as the petitioner was permitted to re-join duty via a fresh order, rendering no issue for consideration.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 555 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6976/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/3RD PETITIONER:
SUKUMARI AMMA AGED 60 YEARS W/O. VIJAYAN NAIR, KUTTIKKATT KONOTH VEEDU, KONCHIRA P.O., VEMBAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT AMRITHA BHAVAN, EDUKKUMTHALA, KONCHIRA P.O., VEMBAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 615. BY ADVS. SRI. VINOD RAVINDRANATH SMT. MEENA.A.
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
DR. PREETHA SOMAN FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MEDICAL OFFICER IN CHARGE, CHSC KANYAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 615.
BY ADV. SRI. V. VENUGOPAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 555 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2022
It is seen that the petitioner was permitted to
re-join duty as per Order No.HMC 287/2022 CHCK dated 04.03.2022.
In such circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in the contempt petition. Accordingly,
the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE
NB/23-3
CON.CASE(C) NO. 555 OF 2022
3
A PPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 555/2022
PETITIONER’S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE I
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.HMC 287/2022/ CHCK DATED 28/02/2022 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT’S ANNEXURE: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Sukumari Anna
Dr. Preetha Soman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
