Mathew P.v., v. Prince George
Case brief
What is this about?
Ignored a contempt petition challenging an order regarding compliance of a Full Bench decision in a writ petition. Found the order complied and closed the matter allowing challenge of non-compliance via regular law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 512 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 24968/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
1 MATHEW P.V., AGED 60 YEARS S/O. VARKEY P.M, PLAPPALLIL HOUSE, EDAKKUNNAM P.O, PARATHODE, KOTTAYAM - 686512.
2 LIZY JOSEPH AGED 61 YEARS D/O. BABU KURUVILLA, OLASSAYIL HOUSE, KURISUMOODU P.O, CHANGANACHERRY, PIN - 686104.
3 SABU SEBASTIAN W/O. U.M. SEBASTIAN, VADASSERIL HOUSE, KANJIRAPPALLY P.O, KOTTAYAM.
4 BALACHANDRAN K. AGED 61 YEARS S/O.KESAVANKUTTY NAIR, KAROOR HOUSE, NEAR UNION CLUB, KOTTAYAM - 686001.
5 ALEYAMMA K.P AGED 61 YEARS W/O. JOHNY JOSEPH, KAPLINGATTIL HOUSE, THIRUVAMPADY P.O, NJEEZHOOR - 686612. 6 MARYKUNJU INGATIUS AGED 61 YEARS W/O. BABU SEBASTIAN, MANNARAKATH CHETTIMATTOM, CHETTIKADAVU ROAD, PALA - 676575. 7 FANCY THOMAS AGED 61 YEARS W/O. LATE V.J. MATHEW, VETTUVAZHIYIL HOUSE, VELLASSERRY, KADUTHURUTHY P.O. 8 P.D. ULAHANNAN AGED 62 YEARS S/O. MATHAI DEVASIA, PONNAMBAL HOUSE, PAKALOMATTOM P.O, KRUVILANGAD (VIA), KOTTAYAM - 686633.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order complies with the Full Bench decision granting relief in the original writ petition?
Whether the contempt petition proceedings stand disposed of given alleged non-compliance?
Whether the petitioner can challenge the order further as per law?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mathew P.V. and Others
- respondent
George, Regional Manager
Coram
Amit Rawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court