In a contempt case, the respondent filed an order of 19.02.2022 and affidavit confirming compliance with directions. The court closed the case with liberty to challenge the order if illegality is alleged.
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the order passed by respondent through appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 505 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 490/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER:
CHALAYYAM TRAVELS & TRANSPORTERS,
S.V.M P.O KOZHIKODE, KARUNAGAPALLY, REPRESENTED BY
ITS PROPRIETOR, AKBER BIN KALAM AGED 30 YEARS,
S/O. ABDUL KALAM.
BY ADVS.
V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR
DHEERAJ KRISHNAN PEROT
RESPONDENT:
DEEPENDRA SINGH
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
IREL (INDIA) LTD, PLOT NO . 1207,
VEER SAVARKAR MARG, PRABHADEVI, NEAR SIDDHI
VINAYAK TEMPLE, MUMBAI, INDIA 400 028
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.ADV.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR, SC,
SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC,
SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 10.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CO(C).No.505/2022
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
Contempt Case (C). No.505 of 2022 ---------------------------------------------Dated this the 10th day of March, 2022
JUDGMENT
When this contempt case came up for consideration today, the learned Senior Counsel instructed to appear on behalf of the respondent submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 31.01.2022 in W.P.(C). No.490 of 2022 are complied with and an order dated 19.02.2022 is made available for the perusal of this Court.
3
CO(C).No.505/2022
representation by the 2nd respondent. The order is produced. Legality of that order can be challenged by the petitioner by initiating appropriate proceedings.
Since the directions are complied with, this contempt case is closed, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
JV
CO(C).No.505/2022
4
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 505/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED
31-01-2022 IN WPC 490 OF 2022
Annexure A2TRUE COPY OF THE DELIVERY REPORT OF
EMAIL DATED 07-02-2022 EVIDENCING THE
COMMUNICATION OF ANNR A1 JUDGMENT AND
COPY OF WRIT PETITION TO 2ND
RESPONDENT.
Annexure A3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
16-02-2022 ADDRESSED TO RESPONDENT
HEREIN
Annexure A4TRUE COPY OF THE MAIL DATED 09-02-2022
RECEIVED FROM GEM PORTAL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent complied with the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C). No.490 of 2022.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHALAYYAM TRAVELS & TRANSPORTERS, REPRESENTED BY AKBER BIN KALAM
DEEPENDRA SINGH, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, IREL (INDIA) LTD
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court