Petitioner's counsel submitted the respondent complied with court directions; counsel for the respondent affirmed this. The contempt case was closed without any operative order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 24TH KARTHIKA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 453 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30637/2013 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
T.GURUSAAMY NADAR AND SONS MALIGAI
30/743,VADAKKANTHARA ROAD, BIG BAZAR, PALAKKAD-673 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, G.VIJAYAKUMAR BAPU
MOHAN PULIKKAL MANJU RAJAN NARAYANAN P POTTY
RESPONDENTS:
K.N.SATHEESH, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD, MAVELI BHAVAN, KOCHI-682 020
BY ADV SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 453 OF 2020
2
JUDGMENT
Sri.Mohan Pulickal - learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the respondent has complied with the directions in the judgment fully and therefore, that this contempt case is not being pressed. This is affirmed by Sri.N.D.Premachandran - learned counsel for the respondent also.
In the afore circumstances, this contempt case is closed.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
stu
T.GURUSAAMY NADAR AND SONS MALIGAI
K.N.SATHEESH
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
