Aiswarya v. Vs Dr.E.K.Satheesan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case involving the Registrar, Controller of Examinations, and Vice-Chancellor of University of Calicut, the court closed the petition upon an affidavit confirming compliance with a prior judgment, while granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 26TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 308 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21793/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
AISWARYA V.,
AGED 23 YEARS,
D/O. VIJAYAKUMAR C. VADAKKECHAKKINGAL (H) P.O.,
PERINGOTTUKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 565.
BY ADV C.A.JOJO
RESPONDENTS:
1DR.E.K.SATHEESAN,
AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER.
THE REGISTRAR OF UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,
UNIVERSITY CAMPS , P.O., CALICUT UNIVERSITY,
MALAPPURAM (DT) , KERALA PIN-673 635.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed given the affidavit showing compliance with the earlier judgment.
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioner to challenge the order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AISWARYA V.
- respondent
DR.E.K.SATHEESAN
- respondent
DR. GODWIN SAMRAJ
- respondent
DR. M.K. JAYARAJ
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court