Contempt case challenging non-compliance with directives in WP(C) No. 19533 of 2021 laid to rest as petitioner affirmatively submitted that the order had been complied with albeit belatedly.
Contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 305 OF 2022
JUDGMENT DATED 20.09.2021 IN WP(C) 19533/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
S. VENKITACHALAM AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE SANGHAMESWARAN, MIG 138, GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, NOW RESIDING AT SHREYAS, 37/1399, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682 020. BY ADVS. VINU CHAND GEEVARGHESE MATHEW C.R.VINOD KUMAR
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
VISHNU NATH IAS., (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
SRI.ARAVIND V MATHEW, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C. O.(C) No. 305/2022
: 2 :
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
---------------------------------------------------------
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 305 of 2022 (S) in W.P.(C). No. 19533 of 2021
--------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 10th day of June, 2022.
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is filed complaining that the directives
contained in the judgment dated 20.09.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 19533 of 2021 is not complied with.
counsel for the petitioner submitted that already the order is complied with, though belatedly.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed with the contempt case any further. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is
closed.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be closed as the orders directed in the underlying judgment had been complied with, albeit belatedly.
What is the disposal of the contempt case?
S. Venkitachalam
Vishnu Nath
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
