Dr. John Panicker v. Vs Dr. Venu IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the Court observed that the impugned judgment in the underlying writ petition was set aside by the Division Bench in a subsequent writ appeal. Consequently, the Court held that no cause of action remained and ordered the closure of the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition ordered to be closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 23RD JYAISHTA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 30 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15415/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P.(C).:
DR. JOHN PANICKER V
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O. LATE K.M.VARGHESE PANICKER,
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, ST. GREGORIOUS COLLEGE,
PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA AND RESIDING AT KALEELIL,
TC 2/1623-4, GRA 205A, KOTTARA LANE, GOWREESAPATTOM, PATTOM
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695004.
BY ADVS.
BABU VARGHESE (SR.)
C.V.ALEXANDER
ABHAY FERDINAND
CONTEMNORS/RESPONDENTS 4, 5 & 6 IN THE W.P.(C):
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. JOHN PANICKER
- respondent
DR. VENU IAS
- respondent
V.VIGNESHWARI IAS
- respondent
DR. B.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court