K.Baburaj v. v.P.Subramanian
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the Court closed the case after respondents submitted that the Board of Directors would consider the statutory appeal in a full meeting within one month, addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding procedural irregularity.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order by the Board of Directors is withdrawn. The Board must consider the Statutory Appeal in its meeting within one month and the petitioner shall be given an opportunity to be heard.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 13TH KARTHIKA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 286 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12015/2021 DATED 14.07.2021
PETITIONER:
K.BABURAJ, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. KUNHAMMAR AMMA,
SHIVAM, NEAR S.S KALAMANDIR, NILESWARAM,
KASARAGOD 671 314
BY ADVS.
S.M.PREM
G INDUCHUDAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 V.P.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. V.P CHATHAPAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR 680 020
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition alleging violation of the Court's order by the Board of Directors needs to be upheld given the procedural impropriety of the decision process.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. BABURAJ
- respondent
V.P. SUBRAMANIAN
- respondent
ADV. PEELIPOSE THOMAS
- respondent
ADV. REJI ZACHARIAH
- respondent
ADV. V.K PRASAD
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court