Santhamma J. v. Smt. Sari
Case brief
What is this about?
Kerala High Court closed a contempt of court case filed against the High Court due to waiver by the learned counsel as directions in the underlying writ petition had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed as directions were complied with and case is not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 216 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23828/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
SANTHAMMA J., AGED 72 YEARS W/O LATE GANGADHARA KURUP, PERUMBALATH PADINJATTATHIL, THALAVOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM-691 508
BY ADVS. B.MOHANLAL P.S.PREETHA(K/883/1998) SHINE N.S KARTHIK J SEKHAR
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 SMT. SARI, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D ROADS DIVISION, BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM-691 001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SANTHAMMA J.
- respondent
SMT. SARI
- respondent
SRI. ALEX THOMAS
- respondent
SMT. GEETHA RAJAN
- respondent
SMT.MABLE C.KURIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court