Short contempt order acknowledging that orders issued by the respondent are challengeable, granting liberty to challenge violence against prior court directions, and closing the matter without further substantive ruling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 13TH POUSHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2047 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 11890/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1 K. MANIKANDAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAMBU, SANITATION WORKER, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, RESIDING AT PUTHEN VEEDU, 2/217(1), AVINJI PADAM, AMBIKAPURAM P.O, PALAKKAD-678011.
2 P.K.SIVAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAMBU, SANITATION WORKER, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, RESIDING AT AMBADI HOUSE, MANAPULIKAVU, KUNNATHOORMEDU P.O., PALAKKAD-678013.
3 M.MURUKESAN, AGED 56 YEARS S/O.AYYASWAMI KOWDIAR, SANITATION WORKER, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, RESIDING AT KALAPURATHIL VEEDU, MALAMPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD-678651.
SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.K.C.HARISH
RESPONDENT:
RENUGAJ, IAS, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, DIRECTORATE OF URBAN AFFAIRS, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695033.
SMT.MABLE.C.KURYAN - SR.G.P.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2047 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
When this matter was called today, the learned Senior Government Pleader, Smt.Mable C.Kurian, submitted that the directions in the judgment have been complied with and that an order dated 28.12.2021 has been issued to the petitioners.
In the afore circumstances, reserving the afore requested liberty to the petitioners, I close this contempt case.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
stu
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2047 OF 2021
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2047/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.06.2021 IN W.P(C)NO.11890/2021.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners are given liberty to challenge a new order issued by the respondent in violation of prior directions.
K. MANIKANDAN
P.K.SIVAN
M.MURUKESAN
RENUGAJ, IAS
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
