Disposed
T L George v. Sandhyat
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/2042/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner in a contempt case submitted that directions in a connected writ petition were followed. The Court recorded the submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed on the petitioner's submission of compliance with the previous order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2042 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 22390/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
¶5
PETITIONER
¶6
T L GEORGE
AGED 58 YEARS,S/O.LUKA
THOTTUMARICKAL HOUSE, VAZHAKULAM.P.O, PIN - 686670
BY ADV PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
¶7
RESPONDENT
¶8
SANDHYA T
AGA AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (IRRIGATION OFFICER),
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD., PIN – 682030
¶9
SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN-SR.GP
¶10
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 15.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
¶11
CON.CASE(C) NO.2042 OF 2022
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
T L George
- respondent
Sandhya T
- respondent
Executive Engineer (Irrigation Officer), Civil Station, Kakkanad
- respondent
Smt. Deepa Narayanan
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court