L.L.Sreejith Babu v. Hari Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed due to inaction by Kollam Corporation in removing encroachment despite earlier direction in W.P.(C). Court directed respondent to proceed further with removal without further litigation and closed contempt petition with liberty to revive.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner given liberty to revive the contempt petition at any later stage if required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1985 OF 2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13894/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION:
L.L.SREEJITH BABU AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LAMBODHARAN.K,SANDHYA NIVAS, MUNDAKKAL WEST,KOLLAM-691010. BY ADV B.BILWIN
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION:
HARI KUMAR (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM CORPORATION,KOLLAM-691001.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS,SC,KOLLAM MPT SRI.K.P.HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent corporation must proceed further with removal of encroachment after issuing survey report and notice?
Whether the petitioner can revive the contempt petition if required later?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L.L.SREEJITH BABU
- respondent
KOLLAM CORPORATION
Coram
S.MANIKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court