Reena v. V.R. Premkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge closed a contempt petition arising from a judgment in WP(C) 17324/2021, noting the underlying judgment was stayed by a Division Bench, leaving liberty to rehear upon the outcome of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA,
1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1636 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 17324/2021 DATED 24.09.2021 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC 17324/2021:
REENA
AGED 51 YEARS
W/O. SANU, MALAYIL PARAMBA QUARTERS, CHETTPADY
P.O., PARAPPANANGADI, PIN - 676319
BY ADVS.
K.MOHAMMED FAISAL NAHA
P.A.PETER
TINTU GEORGE
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN WPC 17324/2021:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
REENA
- respondent
V.R. PREMKUMAR
Coram
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court