In this civil contempt case, the petitioner claimed compliance with the judgment dated 12.11.2015, asserting no cause of action survives. The court accepted this submission, termed the petition as closed, and discharged the rules.
Rules stand discharged and the contempt petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2017
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 34180/2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/FIRST PETITIONER:
JOY K.S.
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O.JOSEPH K.D, AGED 58 YEARS,KACHAPPILLY HOUSE,
KUTTIPPUZHA, KUNNUKARA P.O, ERNAKULAM,
PPO KR/KCH/00089868,UAN 100178466150
BY ADV SRI.P.N.MOHANAN
RESPONDENT/SECOND RESPONDENT:
SRI.RANJAY MOOSHAHARY
S/O. MOOSHAHARI, AGED 42 YEARS, REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND
COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
(EPFO), BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN,PATTOM PALACE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 004 RESIDING AT PF
QUARTEERS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. NITA N.S - SC, EPFO
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2017
2
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that the judgment dated 12.11.2015 has been complied with. No cause of action survives in this contempt
petition. Accordingly, petition is closed. Rules stand discharged.
Affidavit filed by the respondent is taken on record.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
nak
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1476 OF 2017
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1476/2017
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED
12.11.2015 IN W.P.©.34180/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has complied with the impugned judgment of 12.11.2015 and whether the cause of action for contempt survives.
Joy K.S.
Sri. Ranjay Moosahary
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court