M.Rajesh Kumar v. P.T.Venugopal
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an order in a writ petition. The court held that corrected orders were issued to the petitioner, a copy was served, and the contempt of court case was therefore closed, reserving liberty to challenge the order if aggrieved.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of court case was closed with liberty to challenge the issued order if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 29TH ASWINA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1469 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.02.2022 IN WP(C) 22081/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
M.RAJESH KUMAR AGED 53 YEARS S/O LATE MADHAVAN KODASERY HOUSE, T.D. ROAD, ERNAKULAM P.O, KOCHI, PIN - 682011 BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3:
1 P.T.VENUGOPAL FATHERS NAME , AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CONVENOR , LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, THRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER , THRIPUNITHURA KRISHI BHAVAN, MINI CIVIL STATION, THRIPUNITHURA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 682011
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt of court case should be closed upon issuance of corrected orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Rajesh Kumar
- respondent
P.T. Venugopal
- respondent
Soniya K.P
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court