Contempt petitioner sought closure as previous directions were complied with. Court noted compliance and discharged rules, allowing challenge to the compliance order.
Contempt petition closed with liberty to challenge the order passed in compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1053 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 38686/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
V.R SHYLAJA,
W/O P.M.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 52 YEARS,
NOW WORKING AS SUPERINTENDENT (ESTABLISHMENT AND
GENERAL) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
ERNAKULAM DEPOT AND RESIDING AT VALUNKAL HOUSE,
ERUMAKKADU PO, EDAYARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
MOB-6238981970, PIN - 689532
BY ADV N.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.3 & 5 IN W.P.(C):
1BIJU PRABHAKAR, I.A.S
AGED 57 YEARS
S/O LATE THACHADI PRABHAKARAN,
WORKING AS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE
ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023
2A. ADBUL NIZAR
AGED 50 YEARS
WORKING AS DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD
TRANSPORT CORPORATION CHENGANUR, PIN - 689121
GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 26.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1053 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the direction contained in the judgment dated 06.08.2021 and the observation recorded therein have been complied with. Nothing survives in this case and therefore request for closure of the same. This contempt petition is ordered to be closed with liberty to challenge the order passed in compliance. Rules stand discharged.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
nak
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1053 OF 2022
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1053/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure |
MEMOCHARGES FILED AGAINST SHRI BIJUPRABHAKAR |
|---|---|
Annexure1 |
CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED06.08.2021 IN W.P.(C) NO.38686/2016FILED BY THE PETITIONER IS PRODUCEDHEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-1. |
Annexure2 |
A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 06.09.2021ISSUED BY THE COUNSEL TO THE PETITIONERTO RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 5 IN THE WRITPETITION IS PRODUCED HEREWITH ANDMARKED AS ANNEXURE-2. |
Annexure3 |
A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 28.09.2021ISSUED BY HER COUNSEL TO THE DISTRICTTRANSPORT OFFICER. CHENGANOOR NT ISPRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED ASANNEXURE-3. |
Annexure4 |
A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 10.02.2022ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENTS BY THECOUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER IS PRODUCEDHEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-4. |
Annexure5 |
. A TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED01.06.2022 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENTIS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED ASANNEXURE-5. |
V.R SHYLAJA
BIJU PRABHAKAR
A. ADBUL NIZAR
S JIMMY GEORGE
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court