Sharafudeen v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam permitted the withdrawal of the petitioner's bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn, with liberty to move afresh.
The High Court at Ernakulam permitted the withdrawal of the petitioner's bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn, with liberty to move afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1943
BAIL APPL. NO. 7031 OF 2021
ARISING FROM CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT NO.78/2021 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICER
PETITIONERS/SOLE ACCUSED:
SHARAFUDEEN, AGED 59 YEARS S/O SAID MUHAMMED PILLAI, HUDADEEN, KATTAKKAL, KUTHRIAKULAM P.O, VEMBAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695615.
BY ADV N.ANAND
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KONDOTTI POLICE STATION, KONDOTTI, MALAPPURAM-673638.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV.SANAL.P.RAJ, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO. 7031 OF 2021
2
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this bail application.
The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to the petitioner to move afresh, if necessary.
Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS, JUDGE
AS
Sharafudeen
The State of Kerala
Sophy Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court