Prasamth Kumar v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application declared infructuous due to petitioner's arrest. Proceedings closed regarding procedural irregularity after advocate's affidavit explained it was an innocent clerical error, not willful conduct.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1943
BAIL APPL. NO. 606 OF 2022
Crime No.1693/2021 of Karamana Police Station
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
PRASANTH KUMAR
AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.RAJENDRAN, T.C.23/1362-10, PUNARTHAM, KOTTUVILAKOM, MELARNANNOOR, KARAMANA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 002.
BY ADV J.G.SYAMNATH
RESPONDENTS/STATE 7 DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRASANTH KUMAR
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
GOPINATH P.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court