Latha. M v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. The learned Judge noted that since the police had already submitted the final report, the apprehension of arrest no longer subsisted, and the matter was closed.
What did the court decide?
Bail application closed; liberty to move jurisdictional court when cause of action arises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 1764 OF 2022
CRIME NO.811/2019 OF MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.10:
LATHA. M AGED 41 YEARS KARUNA NIVAS, VENGALLOOR P.O, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR, PIN – 680 586. BY ADVS. RENJITH B.MARAR LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL ARUN POOMULLI AISWARYA THANKACHAN SURABHI SANTHOSH
RESPONDENT/STATE :
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682031.
BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.NOUSHAD K.A.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. 1764/2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the apprehension of arrest subsists for the purposes of granting preventive bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LATHA. M
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court