P.S.Divakaran v. P.B.Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 13TH POUSHA, 1943
AS NO. 786 OF 1998 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.09.1997 IN OS No.661/1995 OF
I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT (PLAINTIFF IN THE TRIAL COURT):
P.S.DIVAKARAN, S/o SEKHARAN, KAMALALAYAM, PERUVAYAL AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN
RESPONDENT (DEFENDANT IN THE TRIAL COURT):
P.B.MATHEW, S/o BENEDICT, THAMPADANIYIL, KOVOOR AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK AND DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.S.No.786 of 1998
2
JUDGMENT
Appellant and counsel remained absent and there was no representation. It is an appeal of the year 1998. The litigation was started in the year 1995. This would show what is behind it. The absence of the counsel hence cannot be condoned. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution with cost of respondent.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
DMR/-
P.S.DIVAKARAN
P.B.MATHEW
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court