Allowed

Babu.R, v. the Secretary

Kerala HC14 Jan 2021WP(C)/971/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction to the Corporation of Thiruanthapuram to consider and pass orders on his application for an extension of a building permit. The Court allowed the petition directing the respondent to decide the application within four weeks after hearing the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the Ext.P4 application within four weeks after hearing the petitioner.

Babu.R, Vs the Secretary — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 24TH POUSHA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.971 OF 2021(V)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

BABU.R, AGED 61 YEARS S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, T.C.9/813, MANJAADIMOOTTIL, ARAPPUVEETTIL, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O., SHARKARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695304.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 THE SECRETARY CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶11

2 ANITHAKUMAR, D/O.SULOCHANA, ATTUVARAMBIL VEEDU, ERUMALA THOPPU, ANAYARA, VENPALAVATTOM, PETTA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶12

BY ADV.SRI.P.K MANOJ KUMAR,SC

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

W.P(C).No.971 of 2021

¶15

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 application before the 1^st respondent seeking an extension of the building permit that was already granted to him. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on the same, expeditiously, after hearing him.

¶18

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation.

¶19

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 application, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1^st respondent for further action.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE

¶22

mns/14.01.2021

¶23

W.P(C).No.971 of 2021

¶24

¶25

APPENDIX

¶26

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶27

EXHIBIT	P1 TRUE COPY NO.2K2/BA/1 BY THE 1ST	OF 67/14 RESPON	THE BUILDING DATED 27.09.2016 DENT.	PERMIT ISSUED
EXHIBIT	P2 TRUE COPY 04.04.2019 HON'BLE COU	OF IN WP RT.	THE JUDGMENT (C)NO.8236/2019 O	DATED F THIS
EXHIBIT	P3 TRUE COPY IN I.A.NO.	OF THE 3470/2	ORDER DATED 24. 019 IN O.S.NO.20	09.2019 49/2018
	OF 1ST THIRUVANANT	HAPURA	ADDL.MUNSIFF M.	COURT,
EXHIBIT	P4 TRUE COPY 22.10.2019 THE 1ST RES	OF FILED PONDEN	THE APPLICATION BY THE PETITIONER T.	DATED BEFORE

¶28

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

P.A TO JUDGE

Babu.R, v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu.R, v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod.N Vs the Director General of Police

M/S. Adani Vizhinjam Port Pvt. Ltd., Vs Manickal Grama Panchayat

K.M.Jalal Vs Village Officer

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd.

Reghu Ramachandran Vs State of Kerala

Joy C.D. Vs the Secretary