The High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition filed by Jameela Beevi against The Corporation Bank solely because the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021/23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 9142 OF 2020
PETITIONER:
JAMEELA BEEVI, AGED 49 YEARS W/O. NIZAR, MANICHIDATHU, NAMBARUVIKALA, ALUMKADAVU P. O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 690 573.
BY ADV SRI. T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI. PRATHEESH P. SRI. REKHA. S SRI. ANJANA KANNATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE CORPORATION BANK, ALUMKADAVU BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MAIN ROAD, ALUMKADAVU, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 690 573. 2 THE BRANCH MANAGER, CORPORATION BANK, ALUMKADAVU BRANCH, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 690 573.
SRI. S.B PREMACHANDRA PRABHU – SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(C) NO.9142 OF 2020
2
JUDGMENT
Sri.T.S Harikumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seek permission to withdraw
the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SPR
JAMEELA BEEVI
THE CORPORATION BANK
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
