Rohini K. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as not maintainable. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 12TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.803 OF 2021(A)
PETITIONER:
ROHINI K. AGED 52 YEARS W/O MUKUNDAN N.V.(LATE), THANDANKANDIYIL HOUSE, V.O.ROAD,VATAKARA,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673101.
BY ADVS. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR SRI.S.SHYAM KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DEPARTMENT OF PRINTING AND PUBLICATION ,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001
- 2 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR - 670002
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging an office record is maintainable in this Court or must be approached in an appropriate forum.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohini K. (W/o Mukundan N.V.)
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Anu Sivaraman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court