Jayesh P.M. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ mandamus directing Malabar Devaswom Board to evict encroachers from temple land and District Judge to act on a complaint. Court held petition disposed as it was premature; petitioner did not approach District Judge following Supreme Court order procedure.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed without prejudice to petitioner's right to approach District Judge as per law and Ext.P3.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.6292 OF 2021(J)
PETITIONER/S:
JAYESH P.M., AGED 38 YEARS PAZHAMADATHIL PARAPOOR, PUZHACHAAL VENGARA P.O. MALAPPURAM.
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ
SMT.E.S.SONI
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction can be issued to the District Judge to act on a complaint filed by registered post without following the procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court in Ext.P3?
Whether the petitioner approached the District Judge appropriately as required by law and the Supreme Court order?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jayesh P.M.
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
District Collector, Malappuram
- respondent
District Judge, Malappuram
- respondent
Malabar Devaswom Board
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court