Noufal.K.P v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a single-line order where the High Court of Kerala, addressing a writ petition regarding the non-convening of a timing conference, closed the petition by directing the first respondent to take appropriate action in the next scheduled conference without further delay.
What did the court decide?
Directed the first respondent to take appropriate action as expeditiously as possible in the next timing conference.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.4664 OF 2021(G)
PETITIONER:
NOUFAL.K.P AGED 37 YEARS S/O MOHAMMEDALI, KUPPANTEPURAKKAL HOUSE P.O.PUTHIYAKADAPPURAM, NIRAMARUTHOOR, TANUR , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, CIVIL STATION P.O.PIN-676 505.
2 SRI. ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O MAMMAD, EYYATHAYIL HOUSE, MEENADATHUR P.O.TIRUR, PIN-676 307, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding the non-convening of the timing conference should be closed after directing the respondent to take action.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Noufal.K.P
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram
- respondent
Sri. Abdul Latheef
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court