M.B.Biju v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel submitted that the matter has become infructuous. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the Writ Petition on that ground without further ado.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 14TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 45 OF 2010
PETITIONER:
M.B.BIJU, KAANAKALAYAM, PARAKKUNNU P.O., NAVAIKULAM,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.MATHEW SUNNY SRI.P.MOHANDAS ERNAKULAM
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCEE & INDUSTRIES, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2 THE DIRECTOR, EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA, PRAGATHI TOWER, 11TH FLOOR, 26 RAJENDRA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110 008.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.B. BIJU
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR, EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA
- respondent
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), EXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL OF INDIA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court