The High Court at Ernakulam held a writ petition was infructuous and accordingly dismissed it without substantive adjudication on the merits.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 2993 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:
SUBRAMANIAN K @ NANDU AGED 36 YEARS
S/O.GOPI NAIR, KARUMALI HOUSE, MURIKKUNGAL P.O,KODAKARA, THRISSUR DIST-680699
BY ADVS. SRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR SMT.K.L.SREEKALA
RESPONDENT/S:
OTHER PRESENT:
W.P.(C). No. 2993 of 2013
-2-
SMT.RASHMI.K.M, SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
W.P.(C). No. 2993 of 2013
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
W.P.(C) No.2993 of 2013 - Y
Dated this the 1st day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
matter is infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed
as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JUDGE
das
Subramanian K @ Nandu
The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department
The Chief Engineer Administrator PWD
The Superintending Engineer PWD Roads
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The District Collector
P.V. Kunhikrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
