Petitioner sought mandamus for scheme beneficiary list approval and guideline adherence. Court found matter infructuous due to sudden submission by counsel and dismissed the petition.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.2822 OF 2013(C)
PETITIONER:
T.S.AMRUTHANATH AGED 50 YEARS S/O.SUDHAKARAN, THAYYETHU VEEDU, T V PURAM P.O.VAIKKOM, KOTTAYAM DIST-686606
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) SRI.K.N.AJAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001
SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE, SENIOR GOVERNEMNT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.2822 OF 2013(C)
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 8th day of March 2021
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
Ext.P4 is scrupulously followed by the 1st respondent.
Submission recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
smv
WP(C).No.2822 OF 2013(C)
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT P1 | A TRUE COPY APPLICATION RESPONDENT. |
OF THE SPECIMEN OF THE FORM ISSUED BY THE 1ST |
|---|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2 | A TRUE COPY ELIGIBILITY SELECTING B PROJECTS/SC |
OF THE NOTICE FIXING AND PRIORITY CRITERIA FOR ENEFICIARIES UNDER VARIOUS HEMES OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. |
| EXHIBIT P3 | A TRUE COPY 1ST RESPOND APPLICATION |
OF THE RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE ENT EVIDENCING SUBMISSION OF DATED 21/01/2003. |
| EXHIBIT P4 | A TRUE COPY DATED 02/10 RESPONDENT. |
OF THE GO(P) NO.220/97/LAD /1997 ISSUED BY THE 3RD |
| EXHIBIT P5 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER NIL. |
OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED |
| EXHIBIT P6 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER NIL. |
OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED |
| EXHIBIT P7 | A TRUE COPY PETITIONER NIL. |
OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED |
T.S.AMRUTHANATH
T.V.PURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH CIVIL STATION
STATE OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
